Most tokenised asset projects fail in the structure, not the code.
Technical architecture and due diligence for real-world assets. Dubai and LatAm.
Book 20 minutes →What I do
I build tokenisation platforms for real-world assets, and I work with the asset owners behind them.
Most of my pipeline is Latin America — real estate in Peru and Florida, mining, supply-chain traceability in Colombia. Real owners, real assets. What they usually lack is the structure: a legal instrument that actually wraps the asset, a token model that matches it, and a clear view of what has to be resolved before anyone writes code.
I do that structuring work, and I build the platform that comes out of it — issuance, compliance layer, investor portal, custody integration.
Structure over hype
Good structures exist. A properly constituted trust, a real custodian, a registered warrant and a licensed issuer are real protections and deserve credit when they're there.
The failures I see are rarely technical. They're a token model that doesn't match the legal structure, an exit with no buyer, or a compliance layer that can't do what the offering document says it does.
What I don't do
No legal, financial, regulatory or investment advice. No securities structuring, no distribution, no custody, no return promises.
The order is business → legal → technology. Anyone offering to start with the token is selling it backwards.
Background
15+ years in technology, five as CTO. Led 7 teams and 70+ engineers on the LATAM Airlines e-commerce platform at Globant.
Architecture work across transfer-restriction and identity standards, SPV structures, Reg S / Reg D, and NI 43-101 certification.
On a recent Florida real-estate tokenisation, my technical review surfaced six regulatory contradictions that neither the team nor their securities counsel had flagged.
Phase 0 — Blueprint and architecture
Three weeks, fixed price, written deliverable.
- Token model
- Legal-to-technical specification map
- Reference architecture
- Brief for your counsel
- Firm price for the build
- Blocking decisions with owner and date
The deliverable is yours. If you take it to another provider, that's fine — that's how you know the assessment was honest.